With regard to scaffolding, some aspects that may help implement better response-centered discussion may include building questions. I feel if the students have a solid foundation they can build upon discussion wise they will be able to do a better job of talking and participating. Perhaps a way my teacher could incorporate this would be to find topics of interest that will draw the student's interest as some of the articles we read suggested. If the students are interested in what they are potentially talking about, I think it would allow them to be more outspoken with their thoughts as well as inspired to learn and explore the topic further. Another aspect I may suggest would be to allow plenty of wait time because as of now, my teacher does a decent job doing this, however I feel if there was more time for the students to think, their responses would be better thought out. For specific students in my class who have learning disabilities, I feel this would be extremely helpful and beneficial for them. Perhaps rewording or guiding the response-centered discussion would help these students be more successful, positive learning participants in the discussion.
In my classroom, I feel discussion is important, but at the same time needs to be tailored to support the students within the classroom. Support, presentation of questions and information in my opinion are the most important aspects of a successful discussion, as well as student participation.
Stefanie, I think it is really interesting how we are in the same class, though our responses are quite different from one another! Some of this has to do with how each of us sees the class and what they are learning when we are there, but I think a lot of it may have to do with the times and days we go to the classroom. Your response about how discussion flows in the classroom is very similar to what we learned in TE 401 on science discussions, and what I saw a lot of last semester. Though this semester I do not see as much of the instructional based discussion where it is both a form of teaching the students and a great learning tool for the students when they lead the discussion. I think a lot of this has to do with the fact that both times I go the field are in the afternoon and they do a lot of worksheets with short I-R-E type discussions. I think that if my class schedule would have allowed me to go in a morning, I would probably see more of the types of discussions that your see.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that for better response centered discussion in our classroom, there needs to be building questions, more wait time, find topics of interest, as well as better instructions or directions.